Bep Legislative Government

Bepland, while typically treated as a coherent state, draws many distinctions between national and various levels of local government. This text concerns itself with the national-level, primarily legislative branches government.

The national legislative government is divided into two main institutions; we will dub these the advisory government (NAG), and the regulatory government (NRG).

Role of the National Advisory Government
In theöry, the National Advisory Government serves only a lower-ranking legislative function, setting default laws that can then be overridden by local government's legislation. For example, the NAG manages food quality regulations, but because regional government can override practically any NAG national mandates, many consumable items illegal by default are instead authorized and managed on a regional level. Local government is however required to be explicit about it when default laws are overridden; it is a common meme that local specialties are only truly local when they're marked as illegal by default (as opposed to when they're not marked, because the NAG doesn't say anything for or against them). Surströmming comes to mind as a dish that would definitely be illegal to sell under default law, but might be permitted by a local government.

The Advisory Government's authority is non-negligible within local government decisions, but because it can be overridden and often is, it does not hold direct legislative power. With an exception! The high cost of maintaining independent regional institutions for certain national-level functions means there are unwritten rules that all regional government follows the NAG's default laws and other commands in certain fields. This gives the NAG prescriptive andor executive powers over functions such as crisis management, and most infrastucture (crucially the postal system, which among other things also deals with low-level crime).

How the advisory government wields power over national issues in a certain region varies by both region and issue: The indirect legistlative-executive solution is the most common, as it's essentially just local government going "yep, if the Advisory Government has Advice, and we'll take it unconditionally for certain functions". The direct executive solution is less common, occurring mostly in very densely populated areas, where short, direct chains of command are preferable so as to reduce processing load and time. This is sometimes controversial, as it formally gives the advisory government its own executive power, instead of letting it borrow from local governments' executive power so long as they're willing to coöperate.
 * The NAG may have indirect legislative-executive power, meaning the local government employs and generally manages its staff, but has systems in place for the NAG to override local directives,
 * The NAG may have direct executive power, meaning staff is directly managed by a branch of the NAG at all times.

tldr: The National Advisory Government has locally-reversible legislative authority in general, and in/direct executive authority in certain nationally relevant fields.

& yes, the main reason bepland isn't a federation is that I want to avoid the abbreviation FAG.

Role of the National Regulatory Government
The National Regulatory Government (NRG) serves a much less interesting role, in that it holds direct legislative power, and not much else. The Regulatory Government's legislative power can almost never be overturned by local government, and usually applies on a national level; they make absolutive laws. This means the NRG only really makes Big Important Decisions on its own. Its secondary function is to reinforce the Advisory Government's legitimacy, in that it can technically step in and deny local government decisions to override default law. Such a manoeuvre replaces a default law with an absolutive law, and is called an intervention. Note that the absolutive law doesn't have to be the exact same as the default law was, only similar.

Local government wanting to pass controversial overrides of the Advisory Government's default laws are generally dissuaded from making the leap by the fact that the NRG could intervene and kill any chance of that override being possible anywhere in the country for a long time. Interventions don't happen terribly often, but often enough that local government has to act with some reservation against (esp. separatist) radical overrides. The chance of NRG interventions serves to make local legislature a bit more coherent on a national level, without directly forcing it to all derive from one body; if an override is allowed in one region, the NRG generally won't intervene for something similar in another region; and overrides/changes have to be somewhat acceptable to the country's general mood to avoid risking being intervened with, even if they're uncontroversial locally.

The NRG has to tread a fine line as the reinforcing body of the advisory government, because too many interventions takes power away from the NAG and could be taken as a provocation. Confer how interventions are not obligated to enforce the default law, and can make any number of addenda or alterations. Intervention is thus generally inadvisable for the NRG, because the NAG runs many of the national executive functions that the NRG relies on for its own national laws to be enforced (usu. indirectly, in collaboration with local government that also doesn't take well to being intervened with).

tldr: The National Regulatory Government has irreversible legislative authority which is uses for Important Things of National Importance. It also balances local governments' power to radically override the advisory government, while itself being controlled by the advisory government which wins more if local government follows its default laws voluntarily.